Question one
"Genres must adapt in order to survive"- Discuss
INTRO- definition of genre
- it is dynamic
- talk about slasher genres target audience and how it relates to question
YES I AGREE-
- although they must conform to audience expectations, genres also need to change in order to capture the zeitgeist of the time
- there is new technology which means that there can be more special effects made and therefore genres can be changed to be made different
- cultural differences and how times have changed...teenagers are more liberal...go on dates etc...slasher is therefore a genre which needs to surprise and shock audiences
- there is more competition in the industry and therefore films have to compete and therefore be innovative and original.
NO I DON'T AGREE
-audiences have certain expectations of the film and therefore it should stay the same to satisfy their preferences
- the slasher genre always conforms to a set of conventions which define it as that genre it shouldn't be changed as thats how it is classified..."if it's not broke..don't fix it!"- could talk about differences between the two TCMS...or compare psycho and switchblade romance
Conclusion
Overall i believe that genres do need to adapt to survive as it must adhere to the spirit of the age and the different ways of living now taking place.....however to some extent it should adapt as the slasher genre for example needs to fulfil its audience expectations so that they are satisfied.
Question 2
"Can we determine genre from mise en scene alone?"
INTRO- what is mise en scene?
- how does it show the different conventions in the genre?(what aspects)
- which genres and films will you talk about and why isit relevant?
YES I AGREE-
-mise en scene is important because it shows all the conventions...
aspects such as:
costume
lighting
makeup
props
setting
...all important as they show the main conventions and audience expectations....i.e. things like blood etc....ICONOGRAPHY...
NO I DON'T AGREE
there are several other factors which determine the genre...
-repertoire of elements is important...
- media language(style)...fast cuts can determine the pace and mood of the situation...slow cuts...show build temsion....all adds to suspense which determines slasher genre
- sound is important- music....diegetic?...contrapuntal?...adds to tension and suspense
narrative theories- the final girl
- binary oppositons- night and day, good and evil etc.
-equilibrium theory
- narrative enigmas
Conclusion-
mise en scene is important to an extent...
however other factors also determine the genre and these include aspects of media language such as sound and style and also the narrative and theories...these are all significant in determining the genre.
Monday 20 April 2009
Monday 30 March 2009
Texas Chainsaw Massacre Essay
"Compare the two versions of TCM. HOW and WHY are they similar or different, paying close attention to ideas/theories about the ways genres repeat themselves and the wider contextual factors that have influenced any changes."
Texas Chainsaw Massacre(1974) was possibly one of the greatest slasher films of its time as it was the first film which began to reveal the horrific traits and repertoire of elements which are now so commonly viewed in slasher films today. The success of the film induced a remake to be created in 2003 which with the new technology was able to capture the horror and the graphic detail to its full extent making it just as successful. This essay will compare and contrast both versions and attempt to make a judgement as to which one is more successful in achieving its purpose.
The idea of a masked killer was first introduced by TCM as a tool to establish suspense and horror within in the film, several other films such as “Halloween” then began to use their own take on this in order to target the same audience of predominantly C1 C2 and D1 teenage males who experience voyeuristic pleasures in watching the characters within the film suffer, particularly the final girl.
The film can be perceived to be reflect the zeitgeist as it challenges patriarchal ideologies, as at the beginning of the new film the hitchhiker who is the catalyst of the action is a female, contrasting with the original. However, it can also be considered that the females stereotypical ideologies are also reinforced as by the end of the film the audience comes to realise she was merely grieving the loss of her child, establishing the ideology that women are the natural caregivers within the household. Moreover in the newer version more focus is placed upon the male deaths than the female deaths as they are seen to be killed off first and therefore the final girls supports are snatched away as she is made to seem more vulnerable.
Furthermore, due to the lack of technology the older version of the film is less graphic and gory and therefore does not create the same impact that the newer one does. The new film allows the audience to understand each character better so that we can establish a relationship with them and thus when they die the audience is able to empathise with the final girl and are therefore left satisfied at the end when she finally escapes. Both films adhere to the new equilibrium theory to an extent as the films both suffer a disruption when the hitch hiker commits suicide, a realisation when the deaths begin, attempt to repair when the final girl tries to receive help and a new equilibrium when she finally escapes. Moreover, Proppean theory is also challenged as the “princess” in need to be saved actually takes on the role of “the hero” which can be considered to challenge patriarchal ideology despite her being the subject of voyeuristic pleasure from a male audience.
In conclusion, both films are similar as they portray the same ideologies yet their content and the use of editing and direction is completely different in order to appeal to its newly developed younger target audience. Fast Cuts are used as an mtv aesthetic, substantiating this idea and some aspects of the film are altered such as the end where the story continues after the woman gets into the van. Due to lack of technology the 1974 version can be seen to be almost comedic with the benefit of hindsight, and male ideologies are challenged when “leatherface” is shown to be wearing a kitchen apron which in turn also affiliates with the film “psycho” and the idea that a “woman” is the cause of such mayhem to occur.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre(1974) was possibly one of the greatest slasher films of its time as it was the first film which began to reveal the horrific traits and repertoire of elements which are now so commonly viewed in slasher films today. The success of the film induced a remake to be created in 2003 which with the new technology was able to capture the horror and the graphic detail to its full extent making it just as successful. This essay will compare and contrast both versions and attempt to make a judgement as to which one is more successful in achieving its purpose.
The idea of a masked killer was first introduced by TCM as a tool to establish suspense and horror within in the film, several other films such as “Halloween” then began to use their own take on this in order to target the same audience of predominantly C1 C2 and D1 teenage males who experience voyeuristic pleasures in watching the characters within the film suffer, particularly the final girl.
The film can be perceived to be reflect the zeitgeist as it challenges patriarchal ideologies, as at the beginning of the new film the hitchhiker who is the catalyst of the action is a female, contrasting with the original. However, it can also be considered that the females stereotypical ideologies are also reinforced as by the end of the film the audience comes to realise she was merely grieving the loss of her child, establishing the ideology that women are the natural caregivers within the household. Moreover in the newer version more focus is placed upon the male deaths than the female deaths as they are seen to be killed off first and therefore the final girls supports are snatched away as she is made to seem more vulnerable.
Furthermore, due to the lack of technology the older version of the film is less graphic and gory and therefore does not create the same impact that the newer one does. The new film allows the audience to understand each character better so that we can establish a relationship with them and thus when they die the audience is able to empathise with the final girl and are therefore left satisfied at the end when she finally escapes. Both films adhere to the new equilibrium theory to an extent as the films both suffer a disruption when the hitch hiker commits suicide, a realisation when the deaths begin, attempt to repair when the final girl tries to receive help and a new equilibrium when she finally escapes. Moreover, Proppean theory is also challenged as the “princess” in need to be saved actually takes on the role of “the hero” which can be considered to challenge patriarchal ideology despite her being the subject of voyeuristic pleasure from a male audience.
In conclusion, both films are similar as they portray the same ideologies yet their content and the use of editing and direction is completely different in order to appeal to its newly developed younger target audience. Fast Cuts are used as an mtv aesthetic, substantiating this idea and some aspects of the film are altered such as the end where the story continues after the woman gets into the van. Due to lack of technology the 1974 version can be seen to be almost comedic with the benefit of hindsight, and male ideologies are challenged when “leatherface” is shown to be wearing a kitchen apron which in turn also affiliates with the film “psycho” and the idea that a “woman” is the cause of such mayhem to occur.
Scary Movie
Scary Movie is a 2000 film directed by Keenen Ivory Wayans, as part of Wayans Bros. Entertainment. It is an American dark comedy which parodies the horror, slasher, and mystery genres. Several mid- and late-1990s movies are spoofed, including the more subtle horror film parody series Scream trilogy, The Sixth Sense, I Know What You Did Last Summer, The Usual Suspects, The Matrix, and The Blair Witch Project, while it also parodies many of the classic horror films, most notably Halloween.
The tagline is "No mercy. No shame. No sequel.", with the last reference being to the tendency of popular horror movies to become long-running franchises. However, in 2001, Scary Movie 2 was released (with the tagline "We lied"). The film was followed by a series of sequels Scary Movie 3 (2003), and Scary Movie 4 (2006). The original title for the film Scream was "Scary Movie" which ironically was later used to parody it. Both films were released through Dimension Films.
In addition to parodying the Scream series and I Know What You Did Last Summer, a number of other pop cultural references are made:
* The Blair Witch Project - The scene in which Gail Hailstorm and her Jamaican cameraman are videotaping one of the killer's murders, then they get spotted and they try to escape, however, Gail's cameraman gets killed and Gail apologizes to the cameraman's family by videotaping her apology and leaving it behind so it can be found.
* The Usual Suspects - Doofy's character and situation remotely resembles that of Verbal Kint's. The scene towards the ending is an almost exact replica of the final scene from The Usual Suspects, complete with Cindy dropping the coffee mug with "Doofus Porcelain" written on the bottom (a direct parody of the scene where Detective Kujan discovers his own mug was made by a company called "Kobayashi Porcelain"), Doofy's limp gradually disappearing, him shedding clothing to reveal his real appearance, lighting a cigarette etc.
* The Shining - When Buffy is about to be killed the word "Redrum," is whispered. In The Shining, Danny Torrance writes this word (murder reversed), and speaks it, while semi-possesed.
* Titanic and Amistad - When Brenda and Ray are at the movies, a film trailer is shown showing a man on a ship at sea resembling like Captain Edward John Smith of the Titanic, and features a character (Keenen Ivory Wayans) saying the infamous "I'm king of the world!" line, leading the viewer to assume that the film is related to Titanic. Instead, a slave master whips the man, who is revealed to be a slave, as the trailer is revealed to be for a sequel to the 1997 film Amistad.
* Thinner - In the opening scene, Carmen Electra's character is run over by a car. The driver (her father) gets distracted in a similar way as in the movie Thinner.
* The Matrix - The fight scene between Cindy and the killer utilizes "Bullet time" special effects.
* Drop Dead Gorgeous - The beauty pageant scene with Buffy.
The tagline is "No mercy. No shame. No sequel.", with the last reference being to the tendency of popular horror movies to become long-running franchises. However, in 2001, Scary Movie 2 was released (with the tagline "We lied"). The film was followed by a series of sequels Scary Movie 3 (2003), and Scary Movie 4 (2006). The original title for the film Scream was "Scary Movie" which ironically was later used to parody it. Both films were released through Dimension Films.
In addition to parodying the Scream series and I Know What You Did Last Summer, a number of other pop cultural references are made:
* The Blair Witch Project - The scene in which Gail Hailstorm and her Jamaican cameraman are videotaping one of the killer's murders, then they get spotted and they try to escape, however, Gail's cameraman gets killed and Gail apologizes to the cameraman's family by videotaping her apology and leaving it behind so it can be found.
* The Usual Suspects - Doofy's character and situation remotely resembles that of Verbal Kint's. The scene towards the ending is an almost exact replica of the final scene from The Usual Suspects, complete with Cindy dropping the coffee mug with "Doofus Porcelain" written on the bottom (a direct parody of the scene where Detective Kujan discovers his own mug was made by a company called "Kobayashi Porcelain"), Doofy's limp gradually disappearing, him shedding clothing to reveal his real appearance, lighting a cigarette etc.
* The Shining - When Buffy is about to be killed the word "Redrum," is whispered. In The Shining, Danny Torrance writes this word (murder reversed), and speaks it, while semi-possesed.
* Titanic and Amistad - When Brenda and Ray are at the movies, a film trailer is shown showing a man on a ship at sea resembling like Captain Edward John Smith of the Titanic, and features a character (Keenen Ivory Wayans) saying the infamous "I'm king of the world!" line, leading the viewer to assume that the film is related to Titanic. Instead, a slave master whips the man, who is revealed to be a slave, as the trailer is revealed to be for a sequel to the 1997 film Amistad.
* Thinner - In the opening scene, Carmen Electra's character is run over by a car. The driver (her father) gets distracted in a similar way as in the movie Thinner.
* The Matrix - The fight scene between Cindy and the killer utilizes "Bullet time" special effects.
* Drop Dead Gorgeous - The beauty pageant scene with Buffy.
A Nightmare on Elm Street Franchise
A Nightmare on Elm Street is an American horror franchise that consists of eight slasher films, a television show, novels, and comic books. The franchise began with the film series, which was created by Wes Craven, with various other individuals taking over those jobs for each film sequel. The franchise is based on the fictional character of Freddy Krueger, introduced in A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), who stalks and kills teenagers in their dreams; if Freddy kills the teenager in the dream world then they are ultimately killed in the real world. His motives were to seek revenge on their parents, who had burned him alive years before the events of the first Nightmare film. The original film was written and directed by Craven, who returned to co-script the second sequel, A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987), and to write and direct New Nightmare (1994).
The original film was released in 1984, and following it a series of sequels was produced by the independent film company New Line Cinema. New Line often attributes the growth of their company to the success of the Nightmare franchise.[2] The film series as a whole has received mixed reviews by critics, but has been a financial success at the box office. When comparing the United States box office grosses of other American horror film series, A Nightmare on Elm Street is the third highest grossing franchise in adjusted US dollars.[3] In 1988, a television series was produced with Freddy as the host. The pilot episode focused on the night Freddy was burned alive by the angry parents of the children he had killed, though the rest of the series featured episodes with independent plots. Twelve novels, separate from the adaptations of the films, and multiple comic book series were published featuring Freddy Krueger.
Contents
[hide]
The original film was released in 1984, and following it a series of sequels was produced by the independent film company New Line Cinema. New Line often attributes the growth of their company to the success of the Nightmare franchise.[2] The film series as a whole has received mixed reviews by critics, but has been a financial success at the box office. When comparing the United States box office grosses of other American horror film series, A Nightmare on Elm Street is the third highest grossing franchise in adjusted US dollars.[3] In 1988, a television series was produced with Freddy as the host. The pilot episode focused on the night Freddy was burned alive by the angry parents of the children he had killed, though the rest of the series featured episodes with independent plots. Twelve novels, separate from the adaptations of the films, and multiple comic book series were published featuring Freddy Krueger.
Contents
[hide]
Friday 13th Franchise
i will be keeping the predominant factors the same such as the storyline and particular scenes i.e. with the mother and the snake etc. However i will include some faster cuts and slower and scenes to build more suspense and tension. For example the scene where the boy comes out of the water despite the slow classical music being contrapuntal and therefore comedic, it makes the scene look almost comedic. In turn i will music which will arouse tension yet make the audience oblivious to what is about to happen.Moreover, chasing scenes and scenes where th killer has time to run away are predictable and therefore a range of differnt shots will be used.
Friday the 13th
Friday the 13th is an American horror franchise that consists of twelve slasher films, a television show, novels, comic books, and various merchandise. The franchise mainly focuses on the fictional character of Jason Voorhees, who drowned at Camp Crystal Lake as a boy due to the negligence of the teenage counselors. Decades later, the lake is rumored to be "cursed" and is the setting for a series of mass murders. Jason is featured in all of the films, either as the killer or as the motivation for the killings. The original film was written by Victor Miller, and was produced and directed by Sean S. Cunningham; neither returned to write or direct any of the sequels.
Friday the 13th (1980)
Friday the 13th Part 2
Friday the 13th Part III
Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter
Friday the 13th: A New Beginning
Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives
Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood
Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
Jason X
Freddy vs. Jason
Friday the 13th (2009)
Friday the 13th (1980)
Friday the 13th Part 2
Friday the 13th Part III
Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter
Friday the 13th: A New Beginning
Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives
Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood
Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
Jason X
Freddy vs. Jason
Friday the 13th (2009)
Halloween Franchise
I will be keeping most of the features of the film the same in order to meet audience expectations and perpetuate the originality of the film. The dominant iconography will be the use of a masked killer, knives, blood and screaming teenagers. The repetoire of elements including the idea of a final girl and the home alone scenes will also be included.
However, i will be changing several factors in order to adhere to the zeitgeist and appeal to the newly developed teenage audience, a mixture of fast and slow cuts will be used in order to establish tension and therefore evoke a voyeuristic effect. Moreover, i will reveal more personal traits about the final girl and her friends in order for the audience to be able to identify with them and therefore establish a relationship and care for them, doubling the shock impact. The murder scenes will also be more graphic to add to the gory effect and this will be possible due to developments in technology and the removal of censorship. The final girl will also have all of her supports snatched away from her in order to illustrate her vulnerability much like the original film, she will be a virgin in order to adhere to the slasher movie codes. Low key lighting will predominantly be used to reflect the eerie atmosphere and the film will be shot from the girls point of view so the audience can feel involved and empathise with her.
However, i will be changing several factors in order to adhere to the zeitgeist and appeal to the newly developed teenage audience, a mixture of fast and slow cuts will be used in order to establish tension and therefore evoke a voyeuristic effect. Moreover, i will reveal more personal traits about the final girl and her friends in order for the audience to be able to identify with them and therefore establish a relationship and care for them, doubling the shock impact. The murder scenes will also be more graphic to add to the gory effect and this will be possible due to developments in technology and the removal of censorship. The final girl will also have all of her supports snatched away from her in order to illustrate her vulnerability much like the original film, she will be a virgin in order to adhere to the slasher movie codes. Low key lighting will predominantly be used to reflect the eerie atmosphere and the film will be shot from the girls point of view so the audience can feel involved and empathise with her.
Draft 2
Natasha Madan 13B
Media Independent Study
“If I wrote a list of shit Alisson doesn’t let me do, it would be endless”
*To what extent are females portrayed as the more dominant and responsible figures in comparison to their male counterparts, with regards to the film "Knocked Up", and how does this challenge traditional stereotypes in history promulgated by other moving image texts?
Throughout the years, the media has been heavily criticized for it’s depiction of women in films as the natural caregiver i.e. “the traditional housewife” who is predominantly perceived as inferior to her male spouse. This is most certainly true for films such as The Stepford Wives and The Sound of Music where the ideology of “the perfect woman” is conveyed to the audience, substantiating the idea that women in films are somewhat subliminally objectified either sexually or mentally, establishing them as the more subordinate sex. “Women in film” corroborates this theory suggesting that “throughout much of film history, women have been depicted as manipulative, sexually repressed, or sexually overt” . However, since the women’s movement in the 1960s when the contraceptive pill was introduced and several laws were implemented such as the Civil Rights Act it can be argued that women obtained more freedom and their sexual promiscuity became more accepted in society as “feminism became a movement of liberation rather than reform, a movement of breaking away and creating the new” . This essay will investigate to what extent the theory that women are now being portrayed as stronger and more independent in films is true with regards to the film Knocked Up, a comedy which encapsulates the themes of matriarchy and male immaturity. I will be counteracting the theory with the idea that the female protagonist is still yet sexually objectified due to her appearance and her ideological “traditional” attributes and both fundamental stereotypes of the “Madonna” and the “Whore” are still apparent.
The film “Knocked Up” focuses on the characters of Alisson Scott and Ben Stone whose lives are dramatically changed after a one night stand leads to an unwanted
pregnancy and the couple are forced to establish a relationship for the sake of the baby. The film portrays Allison who is a “blonde, beautiful and focused” individual initiating Strauss’ theory of binary oppositions due to Ben’s character who is depicted as unattractive, lazy and immature. This idea is substantiated at the beginning of the film when fast paced cuts are used to portray Bens hectic and fun filled life, the MTV aesthetic symbolises his childlike and teenage qualities and his immaturity when play fighting further supports this idea. Despite the roller coaster used in the beginning sequence to reflect his fun and carefree lifestyle it can be perceived to foreshadow the emotional rollercoaster he must soon endure and the ups and downs in his easygoing life which soon change his character. The sequence then cuts to a scene of Alison sleeping where the non diegetic sound of heavy and sexual music is paused to subsequently reveal a more peaceful and serene tone which ultimately allows the audience from the outset of the film to infer that she is a more responsible and mature character.
This is also corroborated by her high status job off-screen on channel E which challenges the ideological stereotype of women and the glass ceiling effect as films since the 1960s solely featured women who were “limited to family roles. Women were shown doing housework and men were the beneficiaries of their work. On the other hand, men were employed, had careers, and were doing something outside the home.” This quotation illustrates the idea that women in television were previously oppressed and subordinate to their husbands as illustrated in the patriarchal 1960s advert for “Folgers coffee” where the woman’s sole aim in the advert is to please her husband. His dark black suit illustrates his importance and superiority whereas the woman’s white attire depicts her as the innocent “Madonna”, the way in which he also stands up and looks down upon her indicates her vulnerability as a housewife who should make “good coffee” conforming to the traditional stereotype of women during the time.
“Knocked Up” can therefore be considered as switching gender roles due to Alison being the “breadwinner” “we have rarely seen women whose priority is to pursue and develop their ambitions, talents or vocations” therefore depicting her to be different and more dominant in comparison to Ben. However, Laura Mulvey argues “that in order for women to be equally represented in the workplace, women must be portrayed as men are: as lacking sexual objectification” . Alison is promoted to anchor woman on channel E on the condition that she becomes “tighter” as another colleague says, “go home, step on a scale, write down how much you weigh, subtract it by like 20 and way that much” It can therefore be perceived that despite her role as the more dominant sex in the film, she is being subliminally objectified at work, as her employers wish her to embody perfection already shown as she is “the film’s obvious projection of its female ideal, combines the boring-as-cardboard stereotypes of knock-out blond beauty and girl-next-door goodness” . By hiding her pregnancy from her colleagues, her inferiority is validated as it suggests that she must comply with the expectations placed on her and thus portrays her as inferior to the boss of the company who is male, depicting her to be less dominant.
Alison’s sister Debbie is predominantly portrayed as the more dominant figure in the household. She is depicted to be extremely controlling “and the chokehold she exerts on those around, drives her husband Pete to hanker after the innocence of youth" this is suggested when he says, “She doesn’t understand, it’s like she wants to hold me in” the fact that he is submitting himself to be vulnerable to her suggests how he is somewhat scared which suggests that he is undergoing “the crisis of masculinity” which is caused by female dominance.
Her matriarchal nature is also visible in the club scene where Alison furiously shouts at the bouncer. Despite a combining shot of both of them showing the bouncers strength and muscularity in comparison to Alison's sister's petite figure and weakness, her personality and strong character when she uses derogatory language to lower his esteem repeatedly calling him “doorman” represents him as inferior in comparison to her female dominance challenging the historical idea that women should be seen but not heard. This establishes the binary oppositions of inferiority and superiority, respect and disrespect and matriarchy and patriarchy. The fact that only diegetic sound of dialogue and club music is used allows the scene to appear more realistic due to the seriousness of issues despite the scenes comedic conventions. In turn ideologies such as matriarchy, youth, patriarchy and sexuality are all addressed and adhere to contemporary issues regarding the idea that women are still objectified in society as the bouncer only lets in the younger prettier girls which suggests that appearance is still exceedingly significant in obtaining benefits.
However, Alison's sister's character can also be perceived as a symbol of female power and women fighting back, hence stereotypes within this scene are constantly fluctuated and her emotion and anger (illustrated by several close ups) reflect her passion regarding the issue and thus challenges the traditional role of women who should be acceptant of patriarchal society. Similarly, the films, “Joyce at 34 (1972) and A. Rothschild’s Nana, Mom and Me (1974) served to present women as self-sufficient, competent, and assertive. The feminist image of strong, capable and independent women was reflected in the portrayal of on screen heroines.”
Additionally, films such as the 1950 hit “Sunset Boulevard” initiate another form of female dominance through the “femme fatale”, “The typical complaint is that women in films are either 'virgins, mothers or whores’)” where the whore aspect is substantiated by the film, however it can be perceived that “Although they use their sexuality, they derive power from it and use their intellect to get what they want. They represent strong, active women and these virtues override the male-centered moral it is to enforce upon the audience.” The character of Norma therefore challenges the idea that women were not presented as powerful historically despite being sexually objectified; it can be argued that in the film the male is the main object of desire due to her obsession with him and thus contradicts the idea that “the narrative structure of traditional cinema establishes the male character as active and powerful: he is the agent around whom the dramatic action unfolds and the look gets organized. The female character is passive and powerless: she is the object of desire for the male character”.
However this can therefore illustrate that in the 50s women in films were presented as being dependent on men whether they were housewives or whores. According to Sharon Smith “The role of woman in a film almost always revolves around her physical attraction, and the mating games she plays with the male characters.”
Nevertheless the film “Knocked Up” in terms of the sexually active “femme fatale” “sends women the message that it is acceptable to be a serious professional focused on your work without having to be glamorous or sexy to achieve their goals” which partially applies to Alisson as although she is hired due to her appearance, she does not explicitly flaunt herself to obtain her position allowing her to appear as more dominant. Debbie’s superiority is however questioned, despite her having control over decision making in the household and having ascendancy over her husband she “begins as an embodiment of everything women supposedly become if men “subject” themselves to marriage; she is nagging, cold, annoying, controlling, obsessive, uninteresting, and superficial.”
In turn it can be considered that it is unnatural for a woman to be dominant in a household and if she takes the role of a man she is established as “nagging, cold and annoying” this therefore suggests that women are not considered to be more dominant or responsible in “Knocked Up” as their rights are not appreciated by society which can also be inferred when Alisson states, “I don’t want to become like Debbie”. In the final scene Ben’s dominance finally becomes apparent when a heated argument takes place between him and Debbie after she doesn’t let him in the labour room. The scene solely focuses on the dialogue of the characters in order to reflect the significance of the argument; diegetic sound is also demonstrated through the background noises such as hospital scanners etc. to establish realism as the argument complies with the seriousness of the hospital atmosphere. Debbie is wearing light colored clothing as she can be perceived to be an epitome of innocence and vulnerability in comparison to Ben whose dominance is apparent due to his raised voice and serious tone, thus illustrating her inferiority. Long cuts are predominantly used in order to focus on the situation and emphasize its importance as a turning point in the film as Ben is now taking responsibility for his more dominant role in contrast to before, the length of each shot also signifies that Ben will now continuously adapt to this role. The fact that there is also no combining shot of both characters substantiates their difference of opinion and the lack of unity in the decision eventually made, however the cut to Pete subsequent to the argument indicates that she still possesses the dominant role over him and a combining shot of both is used to somewhat represent the unity between them. Medium shots are predominantly employed to emphasize their facial expressions and the emotion felt by each character which draws light upon the emotional situation of Alison giving birth. High key lighting reflects the jovial atmosphere of Alison giving birth despite the argument transpiring, reminding the audience of the films comedic conventions.
Alison’s is subsequently reduced to being another repressed female as “in the absence of male domination, she wasn’t allowed to be feminine and submissive the way she becomes in this final scene.”
Despite Ben being irresponsible and childish, after discovering that Alisson is pregnant, he ideologically becomes the “new man” which emphasises her dominance. It can be perceived that for this miraculous change to occur it took the productivity of a woman to make the man more effeminate which suggests that in another sense the female productive organs which are so often used to repress women are actually shown to make them more significant. Similarly, the film “Three Men and a Baby” captures the “zeitgeist” of the time in the late 1980s when the metro sexual man was initiated, the fact that the men become so emotionally attached with the baby suggests challenges the ideology that men should be more masculine and repress their feelings. Similarly, Ben’s responsibility came to light towards the end of the film as he “purchased a house, got a job, and finally read the baby books” . Despite being oblivious to previous sexual objectification by Ben and his friends, Alison can be viewed as subverting Laura Mulvey’s theory. “Mulvey argues that…it is the combination of the patriarchal order of society and looking as a pleasurable act (voyeurism) that create film as an outlet for female sexual exploitation. An important observation that she makes is that the dominance that men embody is only so because women exist.” The fact that Bens day job is “documenting the exact second when women appear naked in movies” substantiates Mulvey’s theory however the scene where Debbie and Alisson spy on Ben playing with the children can be considered to conform to aspects of “The triple male gaze” which is “the gaze of the camera, which (via the cinematographer/ director) chooses what is to be shown on the screen; of the male protagonist on the screen who directs our gaze to the female objects of his gaze, and, most crucial, the gaze of the male viewers in the audience, whose fantasies it is uniquely the intention of classical cinema to activate.” However, in this instance it adheres to the idea of the “female gaze” with the lack of sexual objectification. The audience is made to watch Ben playing with the children through the eyes of Alisson and Debbie who criticises him for playing “fetch” with her kids and treating them like “dogs” , therefore the male is shown to be a victim and oblivious to the fact that he’s being watched thus showing a shift in dominance and control from the male to the female.
Nevertheless, regardless of Alison being considered as dominant throughout the film, it can be considered that as a woman she must still sacrifice her dreams and career in order to rear her child after birth which opposes her life plan as she states to Ben that she didn’t think of having kids “for at least another 10 years” as she lives "In an age when professionals like the ones represented here are putting off having children until their careers are established" which in turn suggests that no matter how hard she tries, the glass ceiling affect will always remain, however she is still depicted as more dominant than women historically where “Female characters who are uninterested in motherhood and domesticity are frequently depicted as lacking something or paying a price for their success.”
In conclusion, it can be argued that Alison and Debbie both depict how women have changed and grown to be more independent throughout the years due to the control which they maintain over their male counterparts. While Gaye Tuchman argues that women were “symbolically annihilated” , Knocked Up depicts Alisson as a strong, career focused and independent woman severely emphasising the stupidity of Ben which challenges the historical stereotypes of women in films such as The Sound of Music where they are repressed and compelled to take on the role of childcare thus contributing to “sex role stereotyping” . Nevertheless, it can be argued that Ben becomes more dominant towards the end of the film and responsible towards Alison’s needs which suggests that the main aim of the film is to provide the male with his more dominant title, therefore mocking the idea of opposite gender roles as they are not typical of today’s society.
References
Aiken, D., Chapman, S., & Moore, S. (2005). Sociology AS for AQA. London: HARPERCOLLINSPUBLISHERS.
Female Representation in Films. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2008, from http://www.screenonline.org.uk/film/id/824016/ .
Feminism and the Women�s Film Movement. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://www.bristol.ac.uk/Depts/History/Sixties/Feminism/film.htm.
Feminist film theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_film_theory.
Folger's Coffee. (n.d.). Retrieved December 16, 2008, from www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ODl8ewGQk4.
Gauntlett, D. (2008). Media, Gender and Identity: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Green, P. (1998). Cracks in the Pedestal: Ideology and Gender in Hollywood. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
How did the Women's Movement develop in the 1960s?. (n.d.). Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/usa/womensmovement.htm .
Knocked Up | Film | The Guardian . (n.d.). Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2007/aug/24/juddapatow.comedy.
Sandhu, S. (n.d.). Film review: Knocked Up - Telegraph. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/3667450/Film-review-Knocked-Up.html.
Smelik, A. (n.d.). Feminist Film Theory. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.let.uu.nl/womens_studies/anneke/filmtheory.html .
Taylor, S. (n.d.). Knocked Up is F*cked Up. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://rwor.org/a/097/knocked-up-en.html.
Thornham, S. (1999). Feminist Film Theory: A Reader. London: NYU Press.
Women in Film. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2008, from . http://www.geocities.com/albanystudent/wif.html .
Women in the movies: Present. (n.d.). Retrieved February 3, 2009, from https://www.msu.edu/~quattron/WRA140/page3.htm .
Created at www.bibme.org
Media Independent Study
“If I wrote a list of shit Alisson doesn’t let me do, it would be endless”
*To what extent are females portrayed as the more dominant and responsible figures in comparison to their male counterparts, with regards to the film "Knocked Up", and how does this challenge traditional stereotypes in history promulgated by other moving image texts?
Throughout the years, the media has been heavily criticized for it’s depiction of women in films as the natural caregiver i.e. “the traditional housewife” who is predominantly perceived as inferior to her male spouse. This is most certainly true for films such as The Stepford Wives and The Sound of Music where the ideology of “the perfect woman” is conveyed to the audience, substantiating the idea that women in films are somewhat subliminally objectified either sexually or mentally, establishing them as the more subordinate sex. “Women in film” corroborates this theory suggesting that “throughout much of film history, women have been depicted as manipulative, sexually repressed, or sexually overt” . However, since the women’s movement in the 1960s when the contraceptive pill was introduced and several laws were implemented such as the Civil Rights Act it can be argued that women obtained more freedom and their sexual promiscuity became more accepted in society as “feminism became a movement of liberation rather than reform, a movement of breaking away and creating the new” . This essay will investigate to what extent the theory that women are now being portrayed as stronger and more independent in films is true with regards to the film Knocked Up, a comedy which encapsulates the themes of matriarchy and male immaturity. I will be counteracting the theory with the idea that the female protagonist is still yet sexually objectified due to her appearance and her ideological “traditional” attributes and both fundamental stereotypes of the “Madonna” and the “Whore” are still apparent.
The film “Knocked Up” focuses on the characters of Alisson Scott and Ben Stone whose lives are dramatically changed after a one night stand leads to an unwanted
pregnancy and the couple are forced to establish a relationship for the sake of the baby. The film portrays Allison who is a “blonde, beautiful and focused” individual initiating Strauss’ theory of binary oppositions due to Ben’s character who is depicted as unattractive, lazy and immature. This idea is substantiated at the beginning of the film when fast paced cuts are used to portray Bens hectic and fun filled life, the MTV aesthetic symbolises his childlike and teenage qualities and his immaturity when play fighting further supports this idea. Despite the roller coaster used in the beginning sequence to reflect his fun and carefree lifestyle it can be perceived to foreshadow the emotional rollercoaster he must soon endure and the ups and downs in his easygoing life which soon change his character. The sequence then cuts to a scene of Alison sleeping where the non diegetic sound of heavy and sexual music is paused to subsequently reveal a more peaceful and serene tone which ultimately allows the audience from the outset of the film to infer that she is a more responsible and mature character.
This is also corroborated by her high status job off-screen on channel E which challenges the ideological stereotype of women and the glass ceiling effect as films since the 1960s solely featured women who were “limited to family roles. Women were shown doing housework and men were the beneficiaries of their work. On the other hand, men were employed, had careers, and were doing something outside the home.” This quotation illustrates the idea that women in television were previously oppressed and subordinate to their husbands as illustrated in the patriarchal 1960s advert for “Folgers coffee” where the woman’s sole aim in the advert is to please her husband. His dark black suit illustrates his importance and superiority whereas the woman’s white attire depicts her as the innocent “Madonna”, the way in which he also stands up and looks down upon her indicates her vulnerability as a housewife who should make “good coffee” conforming to the traditional stereotype of women during the time.
“Knocked Up” can therefore be considered as switching gender roles due to Alison being the “breadwinner” “we have rarely seen women whose priority is to pursue and develop their ambitions, talents or vocations” therefore depicting her to be different and more dominant in comparison to Ben. However, Laura Mulvey argues “that in order for women to be equally represented in the workplace, women must be portrayed as men are: as lacking sexual objectification” . Alison is promoted to anchor woman on channel E on the condition that she becomes “tighter” as another colleague says, “go home, step on a scale, write down how much you weigh, subtract it by like 20 and way that much” It can therefore be perceived that despite her role as the more dominant sex in the film, she is being subliminally objectified at work, as her employers wish her to embody perfection already shown as she is “the film’s obvious projection of its female ideal, combines the boring-as-cardboard stereotypes of knock-out blond beauty and girl-next-door goodness” . By hiding her pregnancy from her colleagues, her inferiority is validated as it suggests that she must comply with the expectations placed on her and thus portrays her as inferior to the boss of the company who is male, depicting her to be less dominant.
Alison’s sister Debbie is predominantly portrayed as the more dominant figure in the household. She is depicted to be extremely controlling “and the chokehold she exerts on those around, drives her husband Pete to hanker after the innocence of youth" this is suggested when he says, “She doesn’t understand, it’s like she wants to hold me in” the fact that he is submitting himself to be vulnerable to her suggests how he is somewhat scared which suggests that he is undergoing “the crisis of masculinity” which is caused by female dominance.
Her matriarchal nature is also visible in the club scene where Alison furiously shouts at the bouncer. Despite a combining shot of both of them showing the bouncers strength and muscularity in comparison to Alison's sister's petite figure and weakness, her personality and strong character when she uses derogatory language to lower his esteem repeatedly calling him “doorman” represents him as inferior in comparison to her female dominance challenging the historical idea that women should be seen but not heard. This establishes the binary oppositions of inferiority and superiority, respect and disrespect and matriarchy and patriarchy. The fact that only diegetic sound of dialogue and club music is used allows the scene to appear more realistic due to the seriousness of issues despite the scenes comedic conventions. In turn ideologies such as matriarchy, youth, patriarchy and sexuality are all addressed and adhere to contemporary issues regarding the idea that women are still objectified in society as the bouncer only lets in the younger prettier girls which suggests that appearance is still exceedingly significant in obtaining benefits.
However, Alison's sister's character can also be perceived as a symbol of female power and women fighting back, hence stereotypes within this scene are constantly fluctuated and her emotion and anger (illustrated by several close ups) reflect her passion regarding the issue and thus challenges the traditional role of women who should be acceptant of patriarchal society. Similarly, the films, “Joyce at 34 (1972) and A. Rothschild’s Nana, Mom and Me (1974) served to present women as self-sufficient, competent, and assertive. The feminist image of strong, capable and independent women was reflected in the portrayal of on screen heroines.”
Additionally, films such as the 1950 hit “Sunset Boulevard” initiate another form of female dominance through the “femme fatale”, “The typical complaint is that women in films are either 'virgins, mothers or whores’)” where the whore aspect is substantiated by the film, however it can be perceived that “Although they use their sexuality, they derive power from it and use their intellect to get what they want. They represent strong, active women and these virtues override the male-centered moral it is to enforce upon the audience.” The character of Norma therefore challenges the idea that women were not presented as powerful historically despite being sexually objectified; it can be argued that in the film the male is the main object of desire due to her obsession with him and thus contradicts the idea that “the narrative structure of traditional cinema establishes the male character as active and powerful: he is the agent around whom the dramatic action unfolds and the look gets organized. The female character is passive and powerless: she is the object of desire for the male character”.
However this can therefore illustrate that in the 50s women in films were presented as being dependent on men whether they were housewives or whores. According to Sharon Smith “The role of woman in a film almost always revolves around her physical attraction, and the mating games she plays with the male characters.”
Nevertheless the film “Knocked Up” in terms of the sexually active “femme fatale” “sends women the message that it is acceptable to be a serious professional focused on your work without having to be glamorous or sexy to achieve their goals” which partially applies to Alisson as although she is hired due to her appearance, she does not explicitly flaunt herself to obtain her position allowing her to appear as more dominant. Debbie’s superiority is however questioned, despite her having control over decision making in the household and having ascendancy over her husband she “begins as an embodiment of everything women supposedly become if men “subject” themselves to marriage; she is nagging, cold, annoying, controlling, obsessive, uninteresting, and superficial.”
In turn it can be considered that it is unnatural for a woman to be dominant in a household and if she takes the role of a man she is established as “nagging, cold and annoying” this therefore suggests that women are not considered to be more dominant or responsible in “Knocked Up” as their rights are not appreciated by society which can also be inferred when Alisson states, “I don’t want to become like Debbie”. In the final scene Ben’s dominance finally becomes apparent when a heated argument takes place between him and Debbie after she doesn’t let him in the labour room. The scene solely focuses on the dialogue of the characters in order to reflect the significance of the argument; diegetic sound is also demonstrated through the background noises such as hospital scanners etc. to establish realism as the argument complies with the seriousness of the hospital atmosphere. Debbie is wearing light colored clothing as she can be perceived to be an epitome of innocence and vulnerability in comparison to Ben whose dominance is apparent due to his raised voice and serious tone, thus illustrating her inferiority. Long cuts are predominantly used in order to focus on the situation and emphasize its importance as a turning point in the film as Ben is now taking responsibility for his more dominant role in contrast to before, the length of each shot also signifies that Ben will now continuously adapt to this role. The fact that there is also no combining shot of both characters substantiates their difference of opinion and the lack of unity in the decision eventually made, however the cut to Pete subsequent to the argument indicates that she still possesses the dominant role over him and a combining shot of both is used to somewhat represent the unity between them. Medium shots are predominantly employed to emphasize their facial expressions and the emotion felt by each character which draws light upon the emotional situation of Alison giving birth. High key lighting reflects the jovial atmosphere of Alison giving birth despite the argument transpiring, reminding the audience of the films comedic conventions.
Alison’s is subsequently reduced to being another repressed female as “in the absence of male domination, she wasn’t allowed to be feminine and submissive the way she becomes in this final scene.”
Despite Ben being irresponsible and childish, after discovering that Alisson is pregnant, he ideologically becomes the “new man” which emphasises her dominance. It can be perceived that for this miraculous change to occur it took the productivity of a woman to make the man more effeminate which suggests that in another sense the female productive organs which are so often used to repress women are actually shown to make them more significant. Similarly, the film “Three Men and a Baby” captures the “zeitgeist” of the time in the late 1980s when the metro sexual man was initiated, the fact that the men become so emotionally attached with the baby suggests challenges the ideology that men should be more masculine and repress their feelings. Similarly, Ben’s responsibility came to light towards the end of the film as he “purchased a house, got a job, and finally read the baby books” . Despite being oblivious to previous sexual objectification by Ben and his friends, Alison can be viewed as subverting Laura Mulvey’s theory. “Mulvey argues that…it is the combination of the patriarchal order of society and looking as a pleasurable act (voyeurism) that create film as an outlet for female sexual exploitation. An important observation that she makes is that the dominance that men embody is only so because women exist.” The fact that Bens day job is “documenting the exact second when women appear naked in movies” substantiates Mulvey’s theory however the scene where Debbie and Alisson spy on Ben playing with the children can be considered to conform to aspects of “The triple male gaze” which is “the gaze of the camera, which (via the cinematographer/ director) chooses what is to be shown on the screen; of the male protagonist on the screen who directs our gaze to the female objects of his gaze, and, most crucial, the gaze of the male viewers in the audience, whose fantasies it is uniquely the intention of classical cinema to activate.” However, in this instance it adheres to the idea of the “female gaze” with the lack of sexual objectification. The audience is made to watch Ben playing with the children through the eyes of Alisson and Debbie who criticises him for playing “fetch” with her kids and treating them like “dogs” , therefore the male is shown to be a victim and oblivious to the fact that he’s being watched thus showing a shift in dominance and control from the male to the female.
Nevertheless, regardless of Alison being considered as dominant throughout the film, it can be considered that as a woman she must still sacrifice her dreams and career in order to rear her child after birth which opposes her life plan as she states to Ben that she didn’t think of having kids “for at least another 10 years” as she lives "In an age when professionals like the ones represented here are putting off having children until their careers are established" which in turn suggests that no matter how hard she tries, the glass ceiling affect will always remain, however she is still depicted as more dominant than women historically where “Female characters who are uninterested in motherhood and domesticity are frequently depicted as lacking something or paying a price for their success.”
In conclusion, it can be argued that Alison and Debbie both depict how women have changed and grown to be more independent throughout the years due to the control which they maintain over their male counterparts. While Gaye Tuchman argues that women were “symbolically annihilated” , Knocked Up depicts Alisson as a strong, career focused and independent woman severely emphasising the stupidity of Ben which challenges the historical stereotypes of women in films such as The Sound of Music where they are repressed and compelled to take on the role of childcare thus contributing to “sex role stereotyping” . Nevertheless, it can be argued that Ben becomes more dominant towards the end of the film and responsible towards Alison’s needs which suggests that the main aim of the film is to provide the male with his more dominant title, therefore mocking the idea of opposite gender roles as they are not typical of today’s society.
References
Aiken, D., Chapman, S., & Moore, S. (2005). Sociology AS for AQA. London: HARPERCOLLINSPUBLISHERS.
Female Representation in Films. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2008, from http://www.screenonline.org.uk/film/id/824016/ .
Feminism and the Women�s Film Movement. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://www.bristol.ac.uk/Depts/History/Sixties/Feminism/film.htm.
Feminist film theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_film_theory.
Folger's Coffee. (n.d.). Retrieved December 16, 2008, from www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ODl8ewGQk4.
Gauntlett, D. (2008). Media, Gender and Identity: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Green, P. (1998). Cracks in the Pedestal: Ideology and Gender in Hollywood. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
How did the Women's Movement develop in the 1960s?. (n.d.). Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/usa/womensmovement.htm .
Knocked Up | Film | The Guardian . (n.d.). Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2007/aug/24/juddapatow.comedy.
Sandhu, S. (n.d.). Film review: Knocked Up - Telegraph. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/3667450/Film-review-Knocked-Up.html.
Smelik, A. (n.d.). Feminist Film Theory. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.let.uu.nl/womens_studies/anneke/filmtheory.html .
Taylor, S. (n.d.). Knocked Up is F*cked Up. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://rwor.org/a/097/knocked-up-en.html.
Thornham, S. (1999). Feminist Film Theory: A Reader. London: NYU Press.
Women in Film. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2008, from . http://www.geocities.com/albanystudent/wif.html .
Women in the movies: Present. (n.d.). Retrieved February 3, 2009, from https://www.msu.edu/~quattron/WRA140/page3.htm .
Created at www.bibme.org
Tuesday 3 February 2009
Independent Study- First Draft
“If I wrote a list of shit Alisson doesn’t let me do, it would be endless”
*To what extent are females portrayed as the more dominant and responsible figures in comparison to their male counterparts, with regards to the film "Knocked Up", and how does this challenge traditional stereotypes in history promulgated by other moving image texts?
Throughout the years, the media has been heavily criticized for it’s depiction of women in films as the natural caregiver i.e. “the traditional housewife” who is predominantly perceived as inferior to her male spouse. This is most certainly true for films such as “The Stepford Wives” and “The Sound of Music” where the ideology of “the perfect woman” is conveyed to the audience, substantiating the idea that women in films are somewhat subliminally objectified either sexually or mentally, establishing them as the more subordinate sex. “Women in film” corroborates this theory suggesting that “throughout much of film history, women have been depicted as manipulative, sexually repressed, or sexually overt”. However, since the women’s movement in the 1960s when the contraceptive pill was introduced and several laws were implemented such as the Civil Rights Act it can be argued that women obtained more freedom and their sexual promiscuity became more accepted in society as “feminism became a movement of liberation rather than reform, a movement of breaking away and creating the new”. This essay will investigate to what extent the theory that women are now being portrayed as “stronger” and more “independent” in films is true with regards to the film “Knocked Up” and counteracting the theory with the idea that the female protagonist is still yet sexually objectified due to her appearance and her ideological “traditional” attributes and both fundamental stereotypes of the “Madonna” and the “Whore” are still apparent.
The film “Knocked Up” focuses on the characters of Alisson Scott and Ben Stone whose lives are dramatically changed after a one night stand leads to an unwanted pregnancy and the couple are forced to establish a relationship for the sake of the baby. The film portrays Allison who is a “blonde, beautiful and focused” individual initiating Strauss’ theory of binary oppositions due to Ben’s character who is depicted as unattractive, lazy and immature. This idea is substantiated at the beginning of the film when fast paced cuts are used to portray Bens hectic and fun filled life, the MTV aesthetic symbolises his childlike and teenage qualities and his immaturity when play fighting further supports this idea. Despite the roller coaster used in the beginning sequence to reflect his fun and carefree lifestyle it can be perceived to foreshadow the emotional rollercoaster he must soon endure and the ups and downs in his easygoing life which soon change his character. The sequence then cuts to a scene of Alison sleeping where the non diegetic sound of heavy and sexual music is paused to subsequently reveal a more peaceful and serene tone which ultimately allows the audience from the outset of the film to infer that she is a more responsible and mature character. This is also corroborated by her high status job off-screen on channel E which challenges the ideological stereotype of women and the glass ceiling effect as films since the 1960s solely featured women who were “limited to family roles. Women were shown doing housework and men were the beneficiaries of their work. On the other hand, men were employed, had careers, and were doing something outside the home.” This quotation illustrates the idea that women in television were previously oppressed and subordinate to their husbands as illustrated in the patriarchal 1960s advert for “Folgers coffee” where the woman’s sole aim in the advert is to please her husband. His dark black suit illustrates his importance and superiority whereas the woman’s white attire depicts her as the innocent “Madonna”, the way in which he also stands up and looks down upon her indicates her vulnerability as a housewife who should make “good coffee” conforming to the traditional stereotype of women during the time. “Knocked Up” can therefore be considered as switching gender roles due to Alison being the “breadwinner” “we have rarely seen women whose priority is to pursue and develop their ambitions, talents or vocations” therefore depicting her to be different and more dominant in comparison to Ben. However, Laura Mulvey argues “that in order for women to be equally represented in the workplace, women must be portrayed as men are: as lacking sexual objectification”. Alison is promoted to anchor woman on channel E on the condition that she becomes “tighter” as another colleague says, “go home, step on a scale, write down how much you weigh, subtract it by like 20 and way that much” It can therefore be perceived that despite her role as the more dominant sex in the film, she is being subliminally objectified at work, as her employers wish her to embody perfection already shown as she is “the film’s obvious projection of its female ideal, combines the boring-as-cardboard stereotypes of knock-out blond beauty and girl-next-door goodness”. By hiding her pregnancy from her colleagues, her inferiority is validated as it suggests that she must comply with the expectations placed on her and thus portrays her as inferior to the boss of the company who is male, depicting her to be less dominant.
Alison’s sister Debbie is predominantly portrayed as the more dominant figure in the household. She is depicted to be extremely controlling “and the chokehold she exerts on those around, drives her husband Pete to hanker after the innocence of youth" this is suggested when he says, “She doesn’t understand, it’s like she wants to hold me in” the fact that he is submitting himself to be vulnerable to her suggests how he is somewhat scared which suggests that he is undergoing “the crisis of masculinity” which is caused by female dominance. Her matriarchal nature is also visible in the club scene where Alison furiously shouts at the bouncer. Despite a combining shot of both of them showing the bouncers strength and muscularity in comparison to Alison's sister's petite figure and weakness, her personality and strong character when she uses derogatory language to lower his esteem repeatedly calling him “doorman” represents him as inferior in comparison to her female dominance challenging the historical idea that women should be seen but not heard. This establishes the binary oppositions of inferiority and superiority, respect and disrespect and matriarchy and patriarchy. The fact that only diegetic sound of dialogue and club music is used allows the scene to appear more realistic due to the seriousness of issues despite the scenes comedic conventions. In turn ideologies such as matriarchy, youth, patriarchy and sexuality are all addressed and adhere to contemporary issues regarding the idea that women are still objectified in society as the bouncer only lets in the younger prettier girls which suggests that appearance is still exceedingly significant in obtaining benefits. However, Alison's sister's character can also be perceived as a symbol of female power and women fighting back, hence stereotypes within this scene are constantly fluctuated and her emotion and anger (illustrated by several close ups) reflect her passion regarding the issue and thus challenges the traditional role of women who should be acceptant of patriarchal society. Similarly, the films, “Joyce at 34 (1972) and A. Rothschild’s Nana, Mom and Me (1974) served to present women as self-sufficient, competent, and assertive. The feminist image of strong, capable and independent women was reflected in the portrayal of on screen heroines.” Additionally, films such as the 1950 hit “Sunset Boulevard” initiate another form of female dominance through the “femme fatale”, “The typical complaint is that women in films are either 'virgins, mothers or whores’)” where the whore aspect is substantiated by the film, however it can be perceived that “Although they use their sexuality, they derive power from it and use their intellect to get what they want. They represent strong, active women and these virtues override the male-centered moral it is to enforce upon the audience.” The character of Norma therefore challenges the idea that women were not presented as powerful historically despite being sexually objectified; it can be argued that in the film the male is the main object of desire due to her obsession with him and thus contradicts the idea that “the narrative structure of traditional cinema establishes the male character as active and powerful: he is the agent around whom the dramatic action unfolds and the look gets organized. The female character is passive and powerless: she is the object of desire for the male character”.
However this can therefore illustrate that in the 50s women in films were presented as being dependent on men whether they were housewives or whores. According to Sharon Smith “The role of woman in a film almost always revolves around her physical attraction, and the mating games she plays with the male characters.”
Nevertheless the film “Knocked Up” in terms of the sexually active “femme fatale” “sends women the message that it is acceptable to be a serious professional focused on your work without having to be glamorous or sexy to achieve their goals” which partially applies to Alisson as although she is hired due to her appearance, she does not explicitly flaunt herself to obtain her position allowing her to appear as more dominant. Debbie’s superiority is however questioned, despite her having control over decision making in the household and having ascendancy over her husband she “begins as an embodiment of everything women supposedly become if men “subject” themselves to marriage; she is nagging, cold, annoying, controlling, obsessive, uninteresting, and superficial.” In turn it can be considered that it is unnatural for a woman to be dominant in a household and if she takes the role of a man she is established as “nagging, cold and annoying” this therefore suggests that women are not considered to be more dominant or responsible in “Knocked Up” as their rights are not appreciated by society which can also be inferred when Alisson states, “I don’t want to become like Debbie”. In the final scene Ben’s dominance finally becomes apparent when a heated argument takes place between him and Debbie after she doesn’t let him in the labour room. The scene solely focuses on the dialogue of the characters in order to reflect the significance of the argument; diegetic sound is also demonstrated through the background noises such as hospital scanners etc. to establish realism as the argument complies with the seriousness of the hospital atmosphere. Debbie is wearing light colored clothing as she can be perceived to be an epitome of innocence and vulnerability in comparison to Ben whose dominance is apparent due to his raised voice and serious tone, thus illustrating her inferiority. Long cuts are predominantly used in order to focus on the situation and emphasize its importance as a turning point in the film as Ben is now taking responsibility for his more dominant role in contrast to before, the length of each shot also signifies that Ben will now continuously adapt to this role. The fact that there is also no combining shot of both characters substantiates their difference of opinion and the lack of unity in the decision eventually made, however the cut to Pete subsequent to the argument indicates that she still possesses the dominant role over him and a combining shot of both is used to somewhat represent the unity between them. Medium shots are predominantly employed to emphasize their facial expressions and the emotion felt by each character which draws light upon the emotional situation of Alison giving birth. High key lighting reflects the jovial atmosphere of Alison giving birth despite the argument transpiring, reminding the audience of the films comedic conventions.
Alison’s is subsequently reduced to being another repressed female as “in the absence of male domination, she wasn’t allowed to be feminine and submissive the way she becomes in this final scene.”
Despite Ben being irresponsible and childish, after discovering that Alisson is pregnant, he ideologically becomes the “new man” which emphasises her dominance. It can be perceived that for this miraculous change to occur it took the productivity of a woman to make the man more effeminate which suggests that in another sense the female productive organs which are so often used to repress women are actually shown to make them more significant. Similarly, the film “Three Men and a Baby” captures the “zeitgeist” of the time in the late 1980s when the metro sexual man was initiated, the fact that the men become so emotionally attached with the baby suggests challenges the ideology that men should be more masculine and repress their feelings. Similarly, Ben’s responsibility came to light towards the end of the film as he “purchased a house, got a job, and finally read the baby books”. Despite being oblivious to previous sexual objectification by Ben and his friends, Alison can be viewed as subverting Laura Mulvey’s theory. “Mulvey argues that…it is the combination of the patriarchal order of society and looking as a pleasurable act (voyeurism) that create film as an outlet for female sexual exploitation. An important observation that she makes is that the dominance that men embody is only so because women exist.” The fact that Bens day job is “documenting the exact second when women appear naked in movies” substantiates Mulvey’s theory however the scene where Debbie and Alisson spy on Ben playing with the children can be considered to conform to aspects of “The triple male gaze” which is “the gaze of the camera, which (via the cinematographer/ director) chooses what is to be shown on the screen; of the male protagonist on the screen who directs our gaze to the female objects of his gaze, and, most crucial, the gaze of the male viewers in the audience, whose fantasies it is uniquely the intention of classical cinema to activate.” However, in this instance it adheres to the idea of the “female gaze” with the lack of sexual objectification. The audience is made to watch Ben playing with the children through the eyes of Alisson and Debbie who criticises him for playing “fetch” with her kids and treating them like “dogs”, therefore the male is shown to be a victim and oblivious to the fact that he’s being watched thus showing a shift in dominance and control from the male to the female. Nevertheless, regardless of Alison being considered as dominant throughout the film, it can be considered that as a woman she must still sacrifice her dreams and career in order to rear her child after birth which opposes her life plan as she states to Ben that she didn’t think of having kids “for at least another 10 years” as she lives "In an age when professionals like the ones represented here are putting off having children until their careers are established" which in turn suggests that no matter how hard she tries, the glass ceiling affect will always remain, however she is still depicted as more dominant than women historically where “Female characters who are uninterested in motherhood and domesticity are frequently depicted as lacking something or paying a price for their success.”
*To what extent are females portrayed as the more dominant and responsible figures in comparison to their male counterparts, with regards to the film "Knocked Up", and how does this challenge traditional stereotypes in history promulgated by other moving image texts?
Throughout the years, the media has been heavily criticized for it’s depiction of women in films as the natural caregiver i.e. “the traditional housewife” who is predominantly perceived as inferior to her male spouse. This is most certainly true for films such as “The Stepford Wives” and “The Sound of Music” where the ideology of “the perfect woman” is conveyed to the audience, substantiating the idea that women in films are somewhat subliminally objectified either sexually or mentally, establishing them as the more subordinate sex. “Women in film” corroborates this theory suggesting that “throughout much of film history, women have been depicted as manipulative, sexually repressed, or sexually overt”. However, since the women’s movement in the 1960s when the contraceptive pill was introduced and several laws were implemented such as the Civil Rights Act it can be argued that women obtained more freedom and their sexual promiscuity became more accepted in society as “feminism became a movement of liberation rather than reform, a movement of breaking away and creating the new”. This essay will investigate to what extent the theory that women are now being portrayed as “stronger” and more “independent” in films is true with regards to the film “Knocked Up” and counteracting the theory with the idea that the female protagonist is still yet sexually objectified due to her appearance and her ideological “traditional” attributes and both fundamental stereotypes of the “Madonna” and the “Whore” are still apparent.
The film “Knocked Up” focuses on the characters of Alisson Scott and Ben Stone whose lives are dramatically changed after a one night stand leads to an unwanted pregnancy and the couple are forced to establish a relationship for the sake of the baby. The film portrays Allison who is a “blonde, beautiful and focused” individual initiating Strauss’ theory of binary oppositions due to Ben’s character who is depicted as unattractive, lazy and immature. This idea is substantiated at the beginning of the film when fast paced cuts are used to portray Bens hectic and fun filled life, the MTV aesthetic symbolises his childlike and teenage qualities and his immaturity when play fighting further supports this idea. Despite the roller coaster used in the beginning sequence to reflect his fun and carefree lifestyle it can be perceived to foreshadow the emotional rollercoaster he must soon endure and the ups and downs in his easygoing life which soon change his character. The sequence then cuts to a scene of Alison sleeping where the non diegetic sound of heavy and sexual music is paused to subsequently reveal a more peaceful and serene tone which ultimately allows the audience from the outset of the film to infer that she is a more responsible and mature character. This is also corroborated by her high status job off-screen on channel E which challenges the ideological stereotype of women and the glass ceiling effect as films since the 1960s solely featured women who were “limited to family roles. Women were shown doing housework and men were the beneficiaries of their work. On the other hand, men were employed, had careers, and were doing something outside the home.” This quotation illustrates the idea that women in television were previously oppressed and subordinate to their husbands as illustrated in the patriarchal 1960s advert for “Folgers coffee” where the woman’s sole aim in the advert is to please her husband. His dark black suit illustrates his importance and superiority whereas the woman’s white attire depicts her as the innocent “Madonna”, the way in which he also stands up and looks down upon her indicates her vulnerability as a housewife who should make “good coffee” conforming to the traditional stereotype of women during the time. “Knocked Up” can therefore be considered as switching gender roles due to Alison being the “breadwinner” “we have rarely seen women whose priority is to pursue and develop their ambitions, talents or vocations” therefore depicting her to be different and more dominant in comparison to Ben. However, Laura Mulvey argues “that in order for women to be equally represented in the workplace, women must be portrayed as men are: as lacking sexual objectification”. Alison is promoted to anchor woman on channel E on the condition that she becomes “tighter” as another colleague says, “go home, step on a scale, write down how much you weigh, subtract it by like 20 and way that much” It can therefore be perceived that despite her role as the more dominant sex in the film, she is being subliminally objectified at work, as her employers wish her to embody perfection already shown as she is “the film’s obvious projection of its female ideal, combines the boring-as-cardboard stereotypes of knock-out blond beauty and girl-next-door goodness”. By hiding her pregnancy from her colleagues, her inferiority is validated as it suggests that she must comply with the expectations placed on her and thus portrays her as inferior to the boss of the company who is male, depicting her to be less dominant.
Alison’s sister Debbie is predominantly portrayed as the more dominant figure in the household. She is depicted to be extremely controlling “and the chokehold she exerts on those around, drives her husband Pete to hanker after the innocence of youth" this is suggested when he says, “She doesn’t understand, it’s like she wants to hold me in” the fact that he is submitting himself to be vulnerable to her suggests how he is somewhat scared which suggests that he is undergoing “the crisis of masculinity” which is caused by female dominance. Her matriarchal nature is also visible in the club scene where Alison furiously shouts at the bouncer. Despite a combining shot of both of them showing the bouncers strength and muscularity in comparison to Alison's sister's petite figure and weakness, her personality and strong character when she uses derogatory language to lower his esteem repeatedly calling him “doorman” represents him as inferior in comparison to her female dominance challenging the historical idea that women should be seen but not heard. This establishes the binary oppositions of inferiority and superiority, respect and disrespect and matriarchy and patriarchy. The fact that only diegetic sound of dialogue and club music is used allows the scene to appear more realistic due to the seriousness of issues despite the scenes comedic conventions. In turn ideologies such as matriarchy, youth, patriarchy and sexuality are all addressed and adhere to contemporary issues regarding the idea that women are still objectified in society as the bouncer only lets in the younger prettier girls which suggests that appearance is still exceedingly significant in obtaining benefits. However, Alison's sister's character can also be perceived as a symbol of female power and women fighting back, hence stereotypes within this scene are constantly fluctuated and her emotion and anger (illustrated by several close ups) reflect her passion regarding the issue and thus challenges the traditional role of women who should be acceptant of patriarchal society. Similarly, the films, “Joyce at 34 (1972) and A. Rothschild’s Nana, Mom and Me (1974) served to present women as self-sufficient, competent, and assertive. The feminist image of strong, capable and independent women was reflected in the portrayal of on screen heroines.” Additionally, films such as the 1950 hit “Sunset Boulevard” initiate another form of female dominance through the “femme fatale”, “The typical complaint is that women in films are either 'virgins, mothers or whores’)” where the whore aspect is substantiated by the film, however it can be perceived that “Although they use their sexuality, they derive power from it and use their intellect to get what they want. They represent strong, active women and these virtues override the male-centered moral it is to enforce upon the audience.” The character of Norma therefore challenges the idea that women were not presented as powerful historically despite being sexually objectified; it can be argued that in the film the male is the main object of desire due to her obsession with him and thus contradicts the idea that “the narrative structure of traditional cinema establishes the male character as active and powerful: he is the agent around whom the dramatic action unfolds and the look gets organized. The female character is passive and powerless: she is the object of desire for the male character”.
However this can therefore illustrate that in the 50s women in films were presented as being dependent on men whether they were housewives or whores. According to Sharon Smith “The role of woman in a film almost always revolves around her physical attraction, and the mating games she plays with the male characters.”
Nevertheless the film “Knocked Up” in terms of the sexually active “femme fatale” “sends women the message that it is acceptable to be a serious professional focused on your work without having to be glamorous or sexy to achieve their goals” which partially applies to Alisson as although she is hired due to her appearance, she does not explicitly flaunt herself to obtain her position allowing her to appear as more dominant. Debbie’s superiority is however questioned, despite her having control over decision making in the household and having ascendancy over her husband she “begins as an embodiment of everything women supposedly become if men “subject” themselves to marriage; she is nagging, cold, annoying, controlling, obsessive, uninteresting, and superficial.” In turn it can be considered that it is unnatural for a woman to be dominant in a household and if she takes the role of a man she is established as “nagging, cold and annoying” this therefore suggests that women are not considered to be more dominant or responsible in “Knocked Up” as their rights are not appreciated by society which can also be inferred when Alisson states, “I don’t want to become like Debbie”. In the final scene Ben’s dominance finally becomes apparent when a heated argument takes place between him and Debbie after she doesn’t let him in the labour room. The scene solely focuses on the dialogue of the characters in order to reflect the significance of the argument; diegetic sound is also demonstrated through the background noises such as hospital scanners etc. to establish realism as the argument complies with the seriousness of the hospital atmosphere. Debbie is wearing light colored clothing as she can be perceived to be an epitome of innocence and vulnerability in comparison to Ben whose dominance is apparent due to his raised voice and serious tone, thus illustrating her inferiority. Long cuts are predominantly used in order to focus on the situation and emphasize its importance as a turning point in the film as Ben is now taking responsibility for his more dominant role in contrast to before, the length of each shot also signifies that Ben will now continuously adapt to this role. The fact that there is also no combining shot of both characters substantiates their difference of opinion and the lack of unity in the decision eventually made, however the cut to Pete subsequent to the argument indicates that she still possesses the dominant role over him and a combining shot of both is used to somewhat represent the unity between them. Medium shots are predominantly employed to emphasize their facial expressions and the emotion felt by each character which draws light upon the emotional situation of Alison giving birth. High key lighting reflects the jovial atmosphere of Alison giving birth despite the argument transpiring, reminding the audience of the films comedic conventions.
Alison’s is subsequently reduced to being another repressed female as “in the absence of male domination, she wasn’t allowed to be feminine and submissive the way she becomes in this final scene.”
Despite Ben being irresponsible and childish, after discovering that Alisson is pregnant, he ideologically becomes the “new man” which emphasises her dominance. It can be perceived that for this miraculous change to occur it took the productivity of a woman to make the man more effeminate which suggests that in another sense the female productive organs which are so often used to repress women are actually shown to make them more significant. Similarly, the film “Three Men and a Baby” captures the “zeitgeist” of the time in the late 1980s when the metro sexual man was initiated, the fact that the men become so emotionally attached with the baby suggests challenges the ideology that men should be more masculine and repress their feelings. Similarly, Ben’s responsibility came to light towards the end of the film as he “purchased a house, got a job, and finally read the baby books”. Despite being oblivious to previous sexual objectification by Ben and his friends, Alison can be viewed as subverting Laura Mulvey’s theory. “Mulvey argues that…it is the combination of the patriarchal order of society and looking as a pleasurable act (voyeurism) that create film as an outlet for female sexual exploitation. An important observation that she makes is that the dominance that men embody is only so because women exist.” The fact that Bens day job is “documenting the exact second when women appear naked in movies” substantiates Mulvey’s theory however the scene where Debbie and Alisson spy on Ben playing with the children can be considered to conform to aspects of “The triple male gaze” which is “the gaze of the camera, which (via the cinematographer/ director) chooses what is to be shown on the screen; of the male protagonist on the screen who directs our gaze to the female objects of his gaze, and, most crucial, the gaze of the male viewers in the audience, whose fantasies it is uniquely the intention of classical cinema to activate.” However, in this instance it adheres to the idea of the “female gaze” with the lack of sexual objectification. The audience is made to watch Ben playing with the children through the eyes of Alisson and Debbie who criticises him for playing “fetch” with her kids and treating them like “dogs”, therefore the male is shown to be a victim and oblivious to the fact that he’s being watched thus showing a shift in dominance and control from the male to the female. Nevertheless, regardless of Alison being considered as dominant throughout the film, it can be considered that as a woman she must still sacrifice her dreams and career in order to rear her child after birth which opposes her life plan as she states to Ben that she didn’t think of having kids “for at least another 10 years” as she lives "In an age when professionals like the ones represented here are putting off having children until their careers are established" which in turn suggests that no matter how hard she tries, the glass ceiling affect will always remain, however she is still depicted as more dominant than women historically where “Female characters who are uninterested in motherhood and domesticity are frequently depicted as lacking something or paying a price for their success.”
Women in the movies: Present
In the era we live in today with the increasing popularity of movies and availability of movies at home, the way that women are portrayed in the media and movies continue to have a significant impact on roles, fashion, and behavior. Women today are generally portrayed in a variety of roles ranging from “sex objects” to dominators, often in the same movie. Additionally, women today are being portrayed as serious professional women. For example, in the movie "Tomb Raider", Angelina Jolie is on a mission to retrieve an ancient metallic triangle that found in a tomb chamber, the typical action movie. However, the plot synopsis, when describing Jolie’s character, says otherwise.
“She is everything you could wish her to be – cool, but oh so hot and totally in control, ready to save the universe. Her soft whimsical sighs reinforce her femininity and vulnerability. She is her own woman: sexy, confident, a dare devil and a tomboy but still a lady, in essence as well as name. And Angelina Jolie embodies the cartoon-like character with curvaceous abandon and extraordinary grace, athleticism, style and charisma. She is fabulous to watch – sexy, sassy and without question, all woman” (IMDb).
The media is unveiling the message to the viewers that the woman in this movie is sexually appealing, and therefore will get more viewers. Women, who see the movie or read the synopsis, get the impression that they must be “sexy” and “feminine” regardless of any circumstance.
In opposition of this claim, in our era there are also movies that show women as real people, not sex objects. For example, in the movie "The Silence of the Lambs", the main female character, Clarice Starling, is portrayed very differently from the Angelina Jolie’s character in "Tomb Raider." “She is intelligent, independent, career-oriented, and has an engaging personality. Furthermore, the film lacks a conventional romantic subplot even though it establishes the expectation of one when Starling is assigned to work with an older male agent” (229). In the movie, she rejects any male passes, wears conservative apparel, and is very successful in her career. A movie such as this one sends women the message that it is acceptable to be a serious professional focused on your work without having to be glamorous or sexy to achieve their goals.
One issue with today’s movies is the increasing pressure on women to be thin, because most female movie stars appear that way. It is very rare that we see women in the movies appear as “normal size.” This may be why the majority of women who compare themselves to the thin movie stars they see in the movies are not happy with their body image. Actresses such as Jennifer Aniston and Mischa Barton are prime examples. Because of this, eating disorders have become common in young women today. “Research suggests that about one percent (1%) of female adolescents have anorexia. That means that about one out of every one hundred young women between ten and twenty are starving themselves, sometimes to death” (ANRED). This has in my opinion had an extremely negative impact on young women of today. Movies in the present era have shown women to be both progressive and independent, yet still in a sense, inferior to men.
https://www.msu.edu/~quattron/WRA140/page3.htm
“She is everything you could wish her to be – cool, but oh so hot and totally in control, ready to save the universe. Her soft whimsical sighs reinforce her femininity and vulnerability. She is her own woman: sexy, confident, a dare devil and a tomboy but still a lady, in essence as well as name. And Angelina Jolie embodies the cartoon-like character with curvaceous abandon and extraordinary grace, athleticism, style and charisma. She is fabulous to watch – sexy, sassy and without question, all woman” (IMDb).
The media is unveiling the message to the viewers that the woman in this movie is sexually appealing, and therefore will get more viewers. Women, who see the movie or read the synopsis, get the impression that they must be “sexy” and “feminine” regardless of any circumstance.
In opposition of this claim, in our era there are also movies that show women as real people, not sex objects. For example, in the movie "The Silence of the Lambs", the main female character, Clarice Starling, is portrayed very differently from the Angelina Jolie’s character in "Tomb Raider." “She is intelligent, independent, career-oriented, and has an engaging personality. Furthermore, the film lacks a conventional romantic subplot even though it establishes the expectation of one when Starling is assigned to work with an older male agent” (229). In the movie, she rejects any male passes, wears conservative apparel, and is very successful in her career. A movie such as this one sends women the message that it is acceptable to be a serious professional focused on your work without having to be glamorous or sexy to achieve their goals.
One issue with today’s movies is the increasing pressure on women to be thin, because most female movie stars appear that way. It is very rare that we see women in the movies appear as “normal size.” This may be why the majority of women who compare themselves to the thin movie stars they see in the movies are not happy with their body image. Actresses such as Jennifer Aniston and Mischa Barton are prime examples. Because of this, eating disorders have become common in young women today. “Research suggests that about one percent (1%) of female adolescents have anorexia. That means that about one out of every one hundred young women between ten and twenty are starving themselves, sometimes to death” (ANRED). This has in my opinion had an extremely negative impact on young women of today. Movies in the present era have shown women to be both progressive and independent, yet still in a sense, inferior to men.
https://www.msu.edu/~quattron/WRA140/page3.htm
Sunday 1 February 2009
How did the Women's Movement develop in the 1960s?
The movement argued that women were not content with being tied to the home. They wanted careers and campaigned against:
1. Low women’s wages- discrimination against women in the workplace
2. Overt sexism in society e.g. Playboy, Miss America
3. Demanded the right to control their own fertility (birth control)
Achievements
Women became much more aware of their rights. Women’s pay gradually improved. Most people were aware of sexual discrimination and considered it wrong.
The birth control pill was widely available after 1960.
Employment discrimination in Government jobs was ended. By the 1990s far more women had careers and many more were entering the professions.
The Civil Rights Movement grew to include the women's movement and achieved:
1963 - Equal Pay Act
1964 - Civil Rights Act on employment
1972 - Educational Amendment Act outlawing sexual stereotyping in school textbooks.
http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/usa/womensmovement.htm
1. Low women’s wages- discrimination against women in the workplace
2. Overt sexism in society e.g. Playboy, Miss America
3. Demanded the right to control their own fertility (birth control)
Achievements
Women became much more aware of their rights. Women’s pay gradually improved. Most people were aware of sexual discrimination and considered it wrong.
The birth control pill was widely available after 1960.
Employment discrimination in Government jobs was ended. By the 1990s far more women had careers and many more were entering the professions.
The Civil Rights Movement grew to include the women's movement and achieved:
1963 - Equal Pay Act
1964 - Civil Rights Act on employment
1972 - Educational Amendment Act outlawing sexual stereotyping in school textbooks.
http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/usa/womensmovement.htm
Monday 26 January 2009
re- written paragraph
Throughout the years, the media has been heavily criticized for it’s depiction of women in films as the natural caregiver i.e. “the traditional housewife” who is predominantly perceived as inferior to her male spouse. This is most certainly true for films such as “The Stepford Wives” where the ideology of “the perfect woman” is conveyed to the audience, substantiating the idea that women in films are somewhat subliminally objectified either sexually or mentally, establishing them as the more subordinate sex. “Women in film” corroborates this theory suggesting that “throughout much of film history, women have been depicted as manipulative, sexually repressed, or sexually overt”. However, this essay will investigate to what extent the theory that women are now being portrayed as “stronger” and more “independent” in films is true with regards to the film “Knocked Up” and counteracting the theory with the idea that the female protagonist is still yet sexually objectified due to her appearance and her ideological “traditional” attributes.
Self Evaluation
SELF EVALUATION
Write an evaluation of your progress on the Media course since the last report.
Post the work up on your Module 5 blogs.
a. Comment on each of the following, giving yourself a grade with an explanation outlining why:
(Grading should be 1-5: 1 = excellent, 2 = v. good, 3 = good/average, 4 = poor, 5 = v. poor)
Write an evaluation of your progress on the Media course since the last report.
Post the work up on your Module 5 blogs.
a. Comment on each of the following, giving yourself a grade with an explanation outlining why:
(Grading should be 1-5: 1 = excellent, 2 = v. good, 3 = good/average, 4 = poor, 5 = v. poor)
- Attainment- 2
- Effort- 3 i believe i have not been putting as much effort as i should be and need to work more independently
- Punctuality- 4 i'm usually late for lessons
- Submission and quality of homework- 3 my homework is usually on time however there have been occasions where i have missed deadlines and not done the best i could do
- Ability to work independently- 3 i can work independently but get easily distracted
- Quality of writing- 2 i think my quality of writing is quite good :)
- Organisation of Media folder- 2 my media folders well organised and in chronological order
- Oral contributions in class- 2 i think i contribute in class well but could contribute more
- Standard of Module 5 blog- 2 theres alot of research and work on my blog
- Standard of Module 6 blog- 4theres not much work on my med 6 blog
Thursday 8 January 2009
Monday 5 January 2009
1st Paragraph
Throughout the years, the media has been heavily criticized for it’s depiction of women in films as the natural caregiver i.e. “the traditional housewife” who is predominantly perceived as inferior to her male spouse. This is most certainly true for films such as “The Stepford Wives” where the ideology of “the perfect woman” is conveyed to the audience, substantiating the idea that women in films are somewhat subliminally objectified either sexually or mentally, establishing them as the more subordinate sex. However, throughout my research I shall be investigating to what extent the theory that women are now being portrayed as “stronger” and more “independent” in films is true with regards to the film “Knocked Up” and counteracting the theory with the idea that the female protagonist is still yet sexually objectified due to her appearance and her ideological “traditional” attributes.
essay plan (kind of all over the place :|)
Detailed Essay Plan
*To what extent is the female portrayed as the more dominant and responsible figure in comparison to her male counterpart, with regards to the film "Knocked Up", and how does this challenge traditional stereotypes promulgated by other film texts?
Introduction
• Women in previous years have been ideologically stereotyped as “the traditional housewife”- briefly discuss the women’s movement and how it changed- introduction of contraception etc. made women more libertine
• Two fundamental stereotypes of women, that of “purity and innocence” and the idea that women are perceived to be “sexual objects” – “Throughout much of film history, women have been depicted as manipulative, sexually repressed, or sexually overt.” (women in film)
• Women are subliminally objectified in films and considered subordinate to men examples of some films I will be looking at.
• Focus on the question, the film depicts Alison as being a strong and independent individual- "Katherine Heigl plays Alison (blonde, beautiful, focused)"- *Reviews” however this is important as it illustrates that she is still objectified as her appearance is the most significant when it comes to her job.
No she is not dominant, objectified- Arguments
• “Alison, the film’s obvious projection of its female ideal, combines the boring-as-cardboard stereotypes of knock-out blond beauty and girl-next-door goodness”
• “In the absence of male domination, she wasn’t allowed to be feminine and submissive the way she becomes in this final scene.”- women need to be controlled (Debbie)
• Alison is placed on television predominantly due to her appearance....thus suggesting image matters more which implies that she may also be considered inferior within the household.
• Ben gets a job and attempts to be involved in the baby's life- however lack of responsibility when he doesn't read birth books.
• maternal instinct- shows less dominance and thus opposes idea as the women is naturally considered to be more emotional.
• “Debbie begins as an embodiment of everything women supposedly become if men “subject” themselves to marriage; she is nagging, cold, annoying, controlling, obsessive, uninteresting, and superficial.” (quote from a review) this suggests that the film portrays the women as coforming to their “nagging”, “housewife “ stereotypes.
• In the scene where Ben shouts at Debbie- male domination
Yes she is more dominant- Arguments
• Alison has a job and is career focused- which challenges the traditional stereotype of the woman as the “housewife” and the man as the “breadwinner”
• Alison's sister is more controlling over her husband and makes all decisions....which contrasts with the ideological superiority of the male in the household.
• Alison takes responsibility in trying to make the relationship work
• Ben’s utmost stupidity reflects his inability to take responsibility for his actions therefore emphasizing Alison’s maturity and portraying her as more dominant.
• Alison always has the final say!!! – refer to parts in the film
new man- a term used to describe a new type of masculinity identified and developed by advertising media in the 1980's in line with lifestyle marketing strategies.- refers to Ben
Feminist films strongly and seriously approached matters of women’s social and economic status, gender characterisation and the struggle of juggling both family and career roles.
Other texts which can be compared and contrasted with knocked up,
Basic Instinct, Fatal Attraction
“Although they use their sexuality, they derive power from it and use their intellect to get what they want. They represent strong, active women and these virtues override the male-centered moral it is to enforce upon the audience.” (women in film)
The sound of music, gone with the wind
SHEP
“Feminism became a movement of liberation rather than reform, a movement of breaking away and creating the new.” (Feminism and the Women's Film Movement)
*To what extent is the female portrayed as the more dominant and responsible figure in comparison to her male counterpart, with regards to the film "Knocked Up", and how does this challenge traditional stereotypes promulgated by other film texts?
Introduction
• Women in previous years have been ideologically stereotyped as “the traditional housewife”- briefly discuss the women’s movement and how it changed- introduction of contraception etc. made women more libertine
• Two fundamental stereotypes of women, that of “purity and innocence” and the idea that women are perceived to be “sexual objects” – “Throughout much of film history, women have been depicted as manipulative, sexually repressed, or sexually overt.” (women in film)
• Women are subliminally objectified in films and considered subordinate to men examples of some films I will be looking at.
• Focus on the question, the film depicts Alison as being a strong and independent individual- "Katherine Heigl plays Alison (blonde, beautiful, focused)"- *Reviews” however this is important as it illustrates that she is still objectified as her appearance is the most significant when it comes to her job.
No she is not dominant, objectified- Arguments
• “Alison, the film’s obvious projection of its female ideal, combines the boring-as-cardboard stereotypes of knock-out blond beauty and girl-next-door goodness”
• “In the absence of male domination, she wasn’t allowed to be feminine and submissive the way she becomes in this final scene.”- women need to be controlled (Debbie)
• Alison is placed on television predominantly due to her appearance....thus suggesting image matters more which implies that she may also be considered inferior within the household.
• Ben gets a job and attempts to be involved in the baby's life- however lack of responsibility when he doesn't read birth books.
• maternal instinct- shows less dominance and thus opposes idea as the women is naturally considered to be more emotional.
• “Debbie begins as an embodiment of everything women supposedly become if men “subject” themselves to marriage; she is nagging, cold, annoying, controlling, obsessive, uninteresting, and superficial.” (quote from a review) this suggests that the film portrays the women as coforming to their “nagging”, “housewife “ stereotypes.
• In the scene where Ben shouts at Debbie- male domination
Yes she is more dominant- Arguments
• Alison has a job and is career focused- which challenges the traditional stereotype of the woman as the “housewife” and the man as the “breadwinner”
• Alison's sister is more controlling over her husband and makes all decisions....which contrasts with the ideological superiority of the male in the household.
• Alison takes responsibility in trying to make the relationship work
• Ben’s utmost stupidity reflects his inability to take responsibility for his actions therefore emphasizing Alison’s maturity and portraying her as more dominant.
• Alison always has the final say!!! – refer to parts in the film
new man- a term used to describe a new type of masculinity identified and developed by advertising media in the 1980's in line with lifestyle marketing strategies.- refers to Ben
Feminist films strongly and seriously approached matters of women’s social and economic status, gender characterisation and the struggle of juggling both family and career roles.
Other texts which can be compared and contrasted with knocked up,
Basic Instinct, Fatal Attraction
“Although they use their sexuality, they derive power from it and use their intellect to get what they want. They represent strong, active women and these virtues override the male-centered moral it is to enforce upon the audience.” (women in film)
The sound of music, gone with the wind
SHEP
“Feminism became a movement of liberation rather than reform, a movement of breaking away and creating the new.” (Feminism and the Women's Film Movement)
Historical text
Gone with the Wind (1939)-
Synopsis
Scarlett O'Hara is in love with drippy Ashley Wilkes, and is devastated when he announces that he plans to marry his cousin Melanie. She pleads with Ashley to marry her instead, but then, on the first day of the Civil War, she meets mercurial Rhett Butler. A man to match her strength of character and romantic desires,
| |
This text can be used in my independent study as it focuses on the strength and obstinacy Scarlett and also adheres to the traditional stereotypes of women being “virginal” and loyal to their lovers. In turn despite comparing it with “Knocked Up” in the sense that it portrays a strong and independent woman, the Madonna like attributes of women in the film contrast with those of Alison who although being depicted as a career woman is displayed as a “whore” when she sleeps with Ben.
The sound of music (1965)
synopsis:
THE main characters of The Sound of Music are members of an actual family, the Trapps, who successfully toured the world of music in choral concerts.
The first scene takes place at the Nonnberg Abbey in Austria in 1938. The nuns are pursuing their respective tasks, but the postulant Maria is not with them, for she is lying in a hammock on the mountain-top enjoying the beauty of Nature ("The Sound of Music"). The nuns, and the Mother Abbess particularly, are considerably disturbed about her, since they are convinced she is not ready to enter upon a life dedicated solely to religion ("Maria"). The Mother Abbess confesses that there are many pleasures in life which she shares with Maria ("My Favorite Things"), but for Maria's sake she decides to send the postulant away to serve as temporary governess for the seven children of Captain Georg von Trapp, a retured Austrian Naval officer, and a widower.
Maria comes to this household and completely wins over the children's affection, particularly after she entertains them and allays their fears during a thunderstorm ("The Lonely Goatherd"). She teaches the children to love music, and especially to sing ("Do, Re, Me"). And she can be uniquely sympathetic to the oldest of the children, Liesl, when she gets involved in her first love affair, with the village boy, Rolf Gruber ("Sixteen Going on Seventeen").
The Captain brings from Vienna Elsa Schraeder, his fiancée, who prevails on him to give a huge party. After the children bid the guests good night ("So Long, Farewell"), Maria becomes suddenly aware that she has fallen in love with her employer. Horrified, she flees from the villa back to the Abbey, where the Mother Abbess encourages her to overcome any obstacle that may lie in the way of her happiness ("Climb Every Mountain"). Returning to the villa, she finds that the Captain and his fiancée have separated following a quarrel over Nazism. The romance of Maria and the Captain now develops rapidly. They get married in a festive ceremony at the Abbey. After returning from their honeymoon, the Nazis--who by now have invaded Austria--summon the Captain back to naval duty. An avowed anti-Fascist, the Captain resolutely refuses to do so. He arranges to flee from the villa with his wife and children. With the Nazis in pursuit, the Trapps hide in the garden of the Abbey, and after that make their way to freedom by foot over the mountains.
Other texts include
-cat woman- women is protrayed as powerful yet still sexually objectified
- breif encounter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)